Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Putting A Bit Of Elephant Into My Blog

This Bog entry was first published here on Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:16:25 UTC

Today, I received another email from Dan Byrnes, taking me to tusk yet again for not blogging on a topic that I often talk about, in my conversations and emails. A similar email, on a previous occasion, goaded me sufficiently to compose this piece of satire in my blog.

Dan writes as follows:

But I still say, you didn't talk enough about peak oil problems when the problems you were talking about were peak oil-type problems, and since then, the price of oil has risen, no?

All I can say, is, Christmas is coming, and so are higher oil prices.

And in any case, those elephants in the rooms, they're breeding lately, they're mutating, they might all take a DNA step back to being Mammoths, whatever. What does anyone do when the elephants in their rooms get too big? They have a lifestyle change, that's what they have, if only to avoid the stench of the elephant dung.

On the question of Hannibal, the question there is: did he use Indian or African elephants as he crossed the Alps to invade Rome? The only book I've ever read on this suggests he used Indian elephants, mostly as African elephants can't be domesticated. (Without quibbling too much, by way of asking about, if an elephant trained to be used as a weapon of war, is or has been "domesticated". Like, what's "domestication of elephants" about?)

The Romans, too, had elephants in their rooms, elephants called invading Carthaginians.

But really, correct me if I'm wrong here, a properly domesticated elephant is only one that can be trusted to serve wine at dinner parties, anything less, and the vet should be called about the tranquilizer dart gun.

Bearing in mind that well-domesticated elephants should only be told anything on a need to know basis, since their missions are for the most part, impossible anyway.

Re Peak Oil Problems, I doubt the question is, can the problems be domesticated, or not? I tend to think, not. That is, I don't think so.

When the elephant in the room gets too big, have you noticed, the walls tend to fragment, then the ceiling comes down, then the next room goes, and finally, much of the rest of the house. Or in some cases, entire government departments. Take the Australian Wheat Board right now, as an exemplar here.

Welcome to the sound of the clip-clop of horses' hooves. Sound of rumbling drays driven by displaced truck drivers, used to deliver supplies to what will become less-than-super-markets. And so on.

Peak Oil Problems? The un-supering of the modern world.

Hours of happy satire there, no? The un-supering thing. As with the oil-supertanker, when oil is so expensive, no one wants to charter it anymore. So it becomes an oil un-super-tanker. No?

Meantime, on another and even more merciless blog item, re Vista, you are quite correct, just when are computer-users going to realise what the go is with how good Ubuntu is? It took me a while to go Linux, but what we didn't know at the time was, that Ubuntu and wine had solved the problem that did most to keep me with Windows for so long, what to do with the genealogy database - which by the way, now, in some respects behaves much better with Ubuntu 8.04 than it did with Ubuntu 7.10. Not for any reason though that I can specify. It was a very arcane problem there. Twice now, an Ubuntu update to wine has jiggered an aspect of that database operation, then fixed it. It's a problem that will presumably come and go, every now and again, someone doing a wine update gets it wrong, at least for this particular database. S'pose it comes with the territory.

Cheers, Dan.

Sigh, Ok, ok, I haven't blogged about the problems of peak oil, and global warming, because this was supposed to be a Technical blog, that focused on Open Source Software. And in a way these are kinda off topic. Also the global warming elephant is just so big, it leaves me a little paralysed. Generally I think a similar paralysis afflicts governments and corporations all over the world.

But if Dan keeps goading me, I might begin injecting a little more elephant into this blog. Some of you may have noticed that, initially, I labeled this month's blog the Schadenfreude Blog. Actually my schadenfreude may be a little premature since the negative trend in Vista's market share may have been due to the XP cutoff date, rather than a genuine desire amongst computer users to liberate themselves from the yoke of Microsoftish dumbing downwardness. Only time will tell on that score.

Anyway to commemorate the month of the elephant I will label the July blog the Elephantine blog.

In the past few months, Tim Colebatch, economics editor for The Age has inserted quite a bit of elephant into his opinion column. A couple of weeks ago, Mr. Colebatch used the analogy of tidal flows. When a big tide comes in, he opined, some politicians, like the leader of the opposition, Dr. Nelson, declare that they will swim against it!. And they call for the populace to rally round them and, if successful, will swim further out to sea where they will eventually drown. And some politicians like our new prime minister, Mr. Rudd, just get swept away by the tide.

What Tim Colebatch was alluding to was the need for more strategy and less tactics. Recently there has been a lot of noise, at least as loud as the trumpeting of a herd of angry elephants, as motorists drive angrily around bleating, and beating their breasts and tearing their hair about the outrageous, unjustified, quite unfair high price of petrol. Some of them mutter ominously about speculators, oil companies and profiteering. Ironically many of these latter day converts to socialism were formerly some of the most ardent admirers of our great capitalist free market system. But the irony is mostly lost on them. Another intriguing development is the reaction of our political leaders who dither and vacillate in their own personal futile thermodynamic infundibulum.

And if it is true that we get the leaders we deserve, then the unfortunate citizens of the USA must have done something truly dreadful to deserve the bunch of bozos who have hijacked the reins of government in their country. And if you think that language is a bit strong, you should hear the language I use when I talk about them in private conversation.

And those naughty speculators? Well they are mostly investing in futures markets. Actually it is more like gambling than investing. They are betting on the fact that oil prices will rise. And it seems like a pretty safe bet. Since the causes of the problem are structural (to use that lovely economic euphemism) and the solutions are all long-term and strategic, and yet to be embarked upon. Yes, eventually the price of petrol will go down. But only when we can demonstrate that we don't require it any longer.

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Vista Is Toast!



First published here, Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:42:13 UTC

The launch of Vista on the 30th of January 2007, was arguably one of the biggest software events ever. Certainly in terms of money spent, the event was significant. Vista was a massive project with a pentagon-sized budget. The advertising budget alone would probably have rivaled the Gross Domestic Product of some of the world's smaller nations.

The Vista launch was accompanied by a veritable tidal wave of infomertials and trivial pap from the (so-called) technology and IT journalists who write for the mainstream Australian media outlets. At first the Tech and IT pages were stuffed with little fillers and puff-pieces about Vista Sales, new Vista products, etc, etc. No doubt the general populace was under the impression that everything was just peaches and cream with the great Vista Roll-out, as Vista set sail like the Titanic on her maiden voyage.

However, not all the mainstream press around the world was gushing with enthusiasm about Vista. For example, the New York Times, probably the main most of mainstream broadsheets, did run the occasional article hinting that possibly everything was not as rosy as one would hope with Team Redmond.

David Pogue, who posts the techo blog for the NY Times, reported in January 2007, that Microsoft had offered to lend brand spanking new Acer Ferrari laptops (worth over $2000 USD) to many prominent bloggers in the US, so that they could evaluate windows Vista. Apparently, after the evaluation they could do whatever they wanted with with the laptop. The news had been all over the Blogosphere for three weeks by the time David Pogue reported on it, however it was a sign that some of the criticism was beginning to leak into the mainstream.

As the year progressed many more cracks began appearing in the Vista monolith. In the second half of 2007 some journo-techs and retailers began to express the opinion that real sales of Vista were lower than expected.

In Australia, The Bleeding Edge (published in The Age Green Guide) seemed to be extremely underwhelmed by Windows Vista. And they seem to have remained so, to the present day.

Everywhere anecdotal evidence was pouring in that Vista had failed to capture a sizable market share. This was coming from webmasters who monitor the statistics of visitors to their sites.

Across the Pacific, NY Times journos such as Steve Lohr, and Randall Stross, continued to shine the hot harsh glare of mainstream scrutiny on Microsoft and Vista. On the 9th of March 2007, Randall Stross published his article "They Criticised Vista. And They Should Know", in which he reported that some of the early Vista critics actually worked for Microsoft. The scandal of the Microsoft internal mails has lead to legal action and may eventually cost Microsoft dearly.

Many others, including, dear reader, your own humble blogger, joined in the criticism. At long last, on April Fool's Day 2008, I had my hands on encounter with Microsoft's extremely large new flagship. And I was not impressed. In fact I can't recall being so unimpressed about a software release since Windows 95.

Later in the first half of 2008, it was revealed that even Microsoft's ally, Intel would not be rolling out Vista in-house.

Meanwhile, I would receive regular updates of visitor stats from Bondi-based webmaster Brian Robson, who manages several websites in our own Little Apple, (including bondivillage.com etc). Brian reported that Vista's market share, had initially risen, and then, ominously for Microsoft, plateaued in March 2007.

In June, Brian informed me that Vista's figures had gone negative.

Like the RMS Titanic, almost a hundred years ago, it seems that Vista has struck a hard, deep-chilled iceberg.

It is the iceberg of Consumer Resistance. And despite the vast sums of money spent on persuading them to buy something they obviously don't want, consumers are still saying No. Microsoft seems to have failed in their attempt to ram Vista down their unwilling throats.

Although the construction of the mighty ill-fated liner, Titanic, by White Star Lines was a massive project in it's day, the total cost may only have matched Vista's advertising budget. In the case of Vista, a vast vertically integrated global marketing machine continues pumping out thousands of copies of Vista per week. Nevertheless, the number of people removing Vista now exceeds the number of new copies constantly flooding the market, on new computers.

Like the unlucky Titanic before her, SS Vista is now sinking.

The huge marketing effort has, in effect, been like a tax on consumers. Since most of the large manufacturers and chain stores will not sell a computer without an operating system, consumers have purchased Vista with their new computer (and paid for the Operating System, which is bundled with the hardware). Then, they have paid (or begged) someone to remove Vista and install XP. Depending on who performed the removal operation, the consumer has ended up with an "XP upgrade" or a pirated version of XP.

Actually, I think if anyone put it to the test, it might be illegal for one of these stores to insist that they can bundle the Operating System with the hardware. In the USA there is anti-trust legislation which (in theory) should prevent this. In Australia there is the ACCC which, if they did their job, should also prevent such anti-competitive behaviour.

This does raise a couple of interesting questions:

  • Is this just an artifact? A temporary glitch caused by Microsoft officially pulling the plug on XP. The short negative hiccup occurred because lots of users wanted to get in early and replace Vista before the official cutoff? Or is it a genuine trend?

  • When will the general public discover Ubuntu? If they ever do, then a lot of software manufacturers are going to be in trouble.